The local paper wrote an interesting article about me last week, prior to my wheeling the Tidworth 3km. Interesting because it covered both my past and my present: the accident itself and its aftermath. The headline on the front page masthead ran "Trader fights back after horrific accident". This raised a surprising discussion with my children. "Horrific? I wouldn't call your accident horrific. That's a word I'd use after someone had lost their legs following an explosion or something".
I know what they mean and their attitude got me wondering. I have in effect lost my legs. The impact of the accident has been horrific. The change is shocking, so much so that when I met an acquaintance who didn't know, she started crying. One friend said it couldn't have been worse if I had died.
So why do I not think my accident was horrific? Is it to do with the way I look? If I'm sitting on the sofa, I look more or less exactly as I used to. Because of the FES, my legs are still strong. My chest and arms are bigger. But I have no visible scars. My brain hasn't been affected. My speech is unaltered. Yet I'm paralysed. I will probably never walk again. I have no sensation or function below my arms. Why is that not horrific?
Or is it because I'm relatively independent? I don't have a carer. I can drive and cook and swim and look after my children alone. I can push myself around. I don't need help eating or dressing. Yes, life is harder than it used to be but I don't feel incapacitated by my injury. I don't feel disabled.
I think I've gone too far the other way: I've denied the reality of what's happened. I focus on how I'm essentially the same person. And in some ways, I think the children have adopted the same view. I'm wondering if we've all been ignoring the elephant in the room. Whilst in many ways, my life is good, my life is different now. It's time to start accepting it was a horrific accident.

I guess the word horrific is most commonly ascribed to slasher movie gore these days, hence the confusion. I know what you mean about the 'it couldn't have been worse if you died' reaction. I have had that too, and it hurts in a way, beacuse I didn't die and it's tantamount to saying that I might as well be dead, which doesn't really leave me with much. I'm not dead, so what should I do? Just go and hide in a cupboard?
The elephant is in the room, and while it's impolite, one has to ignore it sometimes in order to function. Who wants to spend their whole life talking to an elephant?
Posted by: TimRS | Friday, 06 November 2009 at 11:17
It's a difficult issue isn't it? I was taken aback by the dead comment. But I think the feeling behind the words is what's important: the accident was devastating. That's what I'm struggling with right now. I think I've been denying the impact it's had on me and on many others. I've barely acknowledged the elephant (very rude).
I don't think this means I should be engaging with said elephant. I do find it very tedious talking about my accident and my disability (as you can tell by the fact I have a blog all about living with SCI. But apart from writing here, I find the endless questions rather wearing). Yet the elephant is not Elmer, all bright and cuddly. It's dark and full of pain and very heavy.
Posted by: Andrew F | Saturday, 07 November 2009 at 08:19
I think we dont descibe it was "horrific" because we have to live with it everyday......
That said it is bloody horrific really but im still smiling my friend :)
Posted by: Kelvin Blake | Thursday, 19 November 2009 at 23:53
Smile on! Its the only way forward I reckon...
Posted by: AndrewF23 | Friday, 20 November 2009 at 12:46